View Filing Data

Combined Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets
Investment in hotel properties, net	$ 2,793,632	$ 2,626,690
Investment in loans	12,732	12,840
Property and equipment, net	1,249	1,585
Cash and cash equivalents	362,559	267,454
Restricted cash reserves	95,292	70,520
Hotel receivables, net of allowance of $170 and $406, respectively	27,246	19,556
Deferred financing costs, net	9,661	9,298
Deferred income tax asset	1,453	799
Prepaid expense and other assets	29,389	37,082
Total assets	3,333,213	3,045,824
Liabilities and Owners' Equity
Mortgage loans	1,263,880	1,747,077
Term loan	140,000
Interest rate swap liability	3,008	3,820
Accounts payable and accrued expense	72,372	60,973
Deferred income tax liability	1,453	799
Advance deposits and deferred revenue	7,281	5,927
Accrued interest	3,094	3,495
Distributions payable	8,577
Preferred distributions payable	47
Total liabilities	1,499,712	1,822,091
Shareholders' equity:
Common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 106,324,083 and zero shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively	1,063
Additional paid-in-capital	1,834,184
Distributions in excess of net earnings	(17,118)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2,994)	(3,806)
Total shareholders' equity	1,818,129
Noncontrolling interest
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture	7,046	7,623
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership	11,320
Total noncontrolling interest		7,623
Total noncontrolling interest	18,366
Total equity		1,223,733
Total equity	1,833,501
Total liabilities and equity	$ 3,333,213	3,045,824
Class A Members
Members' capital
Members' capital		6,592
Class B Members
Members' capital
Members' capital		4,751
Fund II Member
Partners' capital
General partner		(13,409)
Limited partners		433,013
Fund II Member \| Series A preferred units
Members' capital
Series A preferred units, no par value, 12.5%, 250 units authorized, issued and outstanding at May 16, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		189
Fund III Member
Partners' capital
General partner		(23,328)
Limited partners		811,918
Fund III Member \| Series A preferred units
Members' capital
Series A preferred units, no par value, 12.5%, 250 units authorized, issued and outstanding at May 16, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		$ 190

Combined Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	May 16, 2011
Hotel receivables, allowance (in dollars)	$ 170	$ 406
Common shares of beneficial interest, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common shares of beneficial interest, shares authorized	500,000,000	0
Common shares of beneficial interest, shares issued	106,324,083	0
Common shares of beneficial interest, shares outstanding	106,324,083	0
Fund II Member \| Series A preferred units
Series A preferred units, percentage (as a percent)	12.50%	12.50%
Series A preferred units, authorized		250	250
Series A preferred units, issued		250	250
Series A preferred units, outstanding		250	250
Fund III Member \| Series A preferred units
Series A preferred units, percentage (as a percent)	12.50%	12.50%
Series A preferred units, authorized		250	250
Series A preferred units, issued		250	250
Series A preferred units, outstanding		250	250

Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Hotel operating revenue
Room revenue	$ 183,096	$ 119,402	$ 331,971	$ 217,379
Food and beverage revenue	23,046	16,444	43,668	31,050
Other operating department revenue	5,388	3,562	10,181	6,464
Total revenue	211,530	139,408	385,820	254,893
Hotel operating expense
Room	39,910	25,551	75,152	48,117
Food and beverage	16,498	11,343	31,629	21,629
Management fees	7,177	4,874	13,115	8,995
Other hotel expenses	60,940	40,981	117,110	78,143
Total hotel operating expense	124,525	82,749	237,006	156,884
Depreciation and amortization	31,685	24,252	64,386	47,930
Property tax, insurance and other	12,615	9,467	24,581	19,017
General and administrative	6,208	4,949	11,222	9,906
Transaction and pursuit costs	634	1,536	3,332	1,983
IPO Costs	10,244		10,244
Total operating expense	185,911	122,953	350,771	235,720
Operating income	25,619	16,455	35,049	19,173
Other income	69	126	224	234
Interest income	358	68	842	161
Interest expense	(28,100)	(23,362)	(54,164)	(45,140)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes	(2,054)	(6,713)	(18,049)	(25,572)
Income tax expense	(407)	(262)	(688)	(516)
Loss from continuing operations	(2,461)	(6,975)	(18,737)	(26,088)
Income from discontinued operations		21,698		22,503
Net (loss) income	(2,461)	14,723	(18,737)	(3,585)
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture	(83)		77
Noncontrolling interest in common units of Operating Partnership	21		21
Net (loss) income attributable to the Company	(2,523)	14,723	(18,639)	(3,585)
Distributions to preferred unitholders	(45)	(16)	(61)	(32)
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders	$ (2,568)	$ 14,707	$ (18,700)	$ (3,617)
Basic and diluted per common share data:
Loss from continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.03)		$ (0.23)
Net loss (in dollars per share)	$ (0.03)		$ (0.23)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding (in shares)	88,767,570		81,228,975
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (in shares)	88,767,570		81,228,975

Combined Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Loss - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in-Capital	Distributions in excess of net earnings	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss	Total Noncontrolling Interests	Operating Partnership	Consolidated Joint Venture	Comprehensive Loss	General Partner Fund II Member	General Partner Fund III Member	Limited Partner Fund II Member	Limited Partner Fund III Member	Members' Capital Class A Members	Members' Capital Class B Members	Preferred Units Fund II Member	Preferred Units Fund III Member
Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 485,747				$ (14,856)					$ (11,440)	$ (17,852)	$ 459,903	$ 50,163	$ 13,643	$ 5,807	$ 189	$ 190
Components of comprehensive loss:
Net (loss) income	(3,585)								$ (3,585)	(14)	(3)	(18,939)	(6,408)	16,324	5,455
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net loss	(43)				(43)				(43)
Unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives	8,187				8,187				8,187
Total comprehensive loss	4,559								4,559
Partners' contributions	190,128									3,361	4,008	4,322	178,437
Partners' distributions	(15,500)									(4,322)	(6,856)	(4,322)
Members' distributions	(28,653)													(28,653)
Distributions to preferred unitholders	(32)											(16)	(16)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2010	636,249				(6,712)					(12,415)	(20,703)	440,948	222,176	1,314	11,262	189	190
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	1,223,733				(3,806)	$ 7,623		$ 7,623		(13,409)	(23,328)	433,013	811,918	6,592	4,751	189	190
Components of comprehensive loss:
Net (loss) income	(18,737)			$ (8,613)		(98)	$ (21)	(77)	(18,737)	(7)		(9,444)	(234)	(256)	(85)
Unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives	812				812				812
Total comprehensive loss	(17,925)								$ (17,925)
Partners' contributions	126,721									4,258	5,031	3,291	114,141
Partners' distributions	(16,296)									(3,230)	(3,798)	(4,876)	(4,392)
Members' distributions	(3,262)													(2,666)	(596)
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net	529,489	$ 316	$ 529,173
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net (in shares)		31,595,000
Issuance of restricted stock		$ 11	(11)
Issuance of restricted stock (in shares)		1,120,830
Amortization of share based compensation	639		639
Share grants to trustees	40		40
Share grants to trustees (in shares)		2,302
Exchange of owners' equity for common stock and units		$ 736	1,304,343			11,413	11,413			$ 12,388	$ 22,095	(421,960)	(921,396)	$ (3,670)	$ (4,070)	61	60
Exchange of owners' equity for common stock and units (in shares)		73,605,951
Distributions to JV partner	(500)					(500)		(500)
Distributions to preferred unitholders	(61)											$ (24)	$ (37)
Redemption of preferred units	(500)															$ (250)	$ (250)
Distributions on common shares and units	(8,577)			(8,505)		(72)	(72)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2011	$ 1,833,501	$ 1,063	$ 1,834,184	$ (17,118)	$ (2,994)	$ 18,366	$ 11,320	$ 7,046
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011	106,324,083	106,324,083

Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (18,737)	$ (3,585)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flow provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of properties		(23,715)
Depreciation and amortization	64,386	47,867
Amortization of deferred financing costs	3,657	1,444
Amortization of deferred management fees	500	500
Share grants to trustees	40
Amortization of share based compensation	639
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps		(43)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Hotel receivables, net	(7,233)	(5,259)
Prepaid expense and other assets	(445)	(2,577)
Accounts payable and accrued expense	9,237	10,187
Advance deposits and deferred revenue	986	(18)
Accrued interest	(401)	(194)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities	52,629	24,607
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of hotel properties, net of cash acquired	(194,830)	(130,004)
Proceeds from principal payments on investment in loans	108
Improvements and additions to hotel properties	(26,331)	(5,020)
Additions to property and equipment	(73)	(71)
Advances from related parties		10,702
Repayments to related parties		(523)
Proceeds from sale of hotel properties		73,166
Funding of restricted cash reserves, net	(24,772)	(3,249)
Net cash flow used in by investing activities	(245,898)	(54,999)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under credit facility		179,956
Repayments under credit facility		(168,905)
Proceeds from term loan	140,000
Proceeds from mortgage loans		60,000
Payment of mortgage principal	(483,197)	(66,878)
Payment of members' distributions	(3,262)	(28,653)
Proceeds from partners' contributions	126,721	190,128
Payment of partners' distributions	(16,296)	(15,500)
Distributions to preferred unitholders	(500)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares	568,700
Payment of offering costs	(39,211)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	(500)
Payment of preferred unitholder distributions	(61)	(32)
Payment of deferred financing costs	(4,020)	(3,680)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities	288,374	146,436
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	95,105	116,044
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	267,454	151,383
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 362,559	$ 267,427

Organization

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Organization

Organization

1. Organization

RLJ Lodging Trust (the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) on January 31, 2011. The Company is a self-advised and self-administered REIT that invests primarily in premium-branded, focused-service and compact full-service hotels. The Company completed the initial public offering of its common shares of beneficial interest (the “IPO”) on May 16, 2011. The IPO resulted in the sale of 27,500,000 common shares at a price per share of $18.00 and generated gross proceeds of $495.0 million. The aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discounts in connection with the IPO, were approximately $464.1 million. On June 3, 2011, the Company issued and sold an additional 4,095,000 common shares at a price per share of $18.00 upon exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option (the “Overallotment”), generating gross proceeds of approximately $73.7 million. The Company received aggregate proceeds, net of underwriters’ discounts, in connection with the Overallotment of approximately $69.1 million. Subsequent to the IPO, the Company contributed the net proceeds from the IPO, including proceeds received from the Overallotment, to the Company’s operating partnership, RLJ Lodging Trust, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), which was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on January 31, 2011, in exchange for units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”). The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the Company’s assets and conducts substantially all of its business. Upon completion of the IPO, the Company owned approximately 99.1% of the aggregate OP units. The Company intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the portion of its taxable year ending December 31, 2011.

Upon completion of the IPO and related formation transactions, the Company succeeded to the operations and hotel investment and ownership platform of RLJ Development, LLC (“RLJ Development”), and the lodging assets of RLJ Lodging Fund II, L.P. (and its parallel fund) (“Fund II”) and RLJ Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (and its parallel fund) (“Fund III”), which collectively comprise the Company’s predecessor (the “RLJ Predecessor”). Accordingly, the RLJ Predecessor was not a separate legal entity. RLJ Development, Fund II and Fund III were entities under the common control of Robert L. Johnson, the Company’s Executive Chairman, and were formed for the purpose of acquiring and operating hotel properties. Upon completion of the IPO and formation transactions, all of the existing investors in RLJ Development, Fund II and Fund III received common shares or OP units, as applicable, as consideration for their respective interests in RLJ Development, Fund II and Fund III, and as a result became equity owners of the Company and/or the Operating Partnership, as applicable. The formation transactions, including the consideration received by the owners of RLJ Development, Fund II and Fund III, are described in greater detail in the final prospectus relating to the IPO, dated May 10, 2011, which the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Due to the timing of the IPO and the formation transactions, the Company’s financial condition as of December 31, 2010 and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 reflect the financial condition and results of operations of the RLJ Predecessor. The Company’s financial condition as of June 30, 2011 and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflect the financial condition and results of operations of the RLJ Predecessor together with the Company.

Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all of its operations are conducted through, the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Company owned, through a combination of direct and indirect interests, 99.2% of the OP units at June 30, 2011. See Note 9 for additional disclosures on OP units.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company owned interests in 141 hotels with 20,924 suites/rooms located in 19 states and the District of Columbia, which includes the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott which is expected to be transferred to a third party no later than September 14, 2011. The Company owned interests in land parcels located adjacent to certain hotels. The Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, also owned a 100% interest in two mortgage loans secured by hotels. The Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owned a 100% interest in all of its assets, with the exception of the Doubletree Metropolitan Hotel New York City, in which the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owned a 95% interest in a joint venture, DBT Met Hotel Venture, LP, which was formed to engage in hotel operations related to the Doubletree Metropolitan hotel. An independent hotel operator manages each hotel.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for organization, consolidation and basis of presentation of financial statements disclosure.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 2-6
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Name Statement of Position (SOP)
-Publisher AICPA
-Number 94-6
-Paragraph 10
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Name FASB Interpretation (FIN)
-Publisher FASB
-Number 46R
-Paragraph 4, 14, 15
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6359553&loc=d3e288-107754

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2197480

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6921930&loc=d3e5614-111684

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 915
-SubTopic 235
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6472506&loc=d3e38932-110933

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 852
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2209116

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 272
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6373374&loc=d3e70478-108055

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6970148&loc=SL6228881-111685

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2122150

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6359566&loc=d3e326-107755

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 720
-SubTopic 15
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2122524

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 275
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2134480

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Staff Position (FSP)
-Number FAS140-4/FIN46(R)-8
-Paragraph 8, C1, C7
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim combined consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to interim financial information. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements include adjustments based on management’s estimates (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which the Company considers necessary for a fair statement of the combined consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of changes in equity and comprehensive loss and statements of cash flows for the interim periods presented. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the combined consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the final prospectus relating to the IPO, dated May 10, 2011, which the Company filed with the SEC. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of actual operating results for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and the amounts of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reporting Periods

As of June 30, 2011, the Company owned five hotels that are managed by affiliates of Marriott International (“Marriott”). The Company’s hotels managed by Marriott are accounted for on a fiscal year comprised of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to December 31. The Company’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 include the results of operations for the Company’s Marriott-managed hotels for the 24-week periods ending June 17, 2011 and June 18, 2010, respectively.

Reclassifications

Certain de minimus prior year amounts in these financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation with no impact to net income, shareholders’ equity or cash flows.

Investment in Hotel Properties

Hotel acquisitions consist almost exclusively of land, land improvements, buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment and inventory. The Company records the purchase price among these asset classes based on their respective fair values. When the Company acquires properties, they are acquired for use. Generally, the Company does not acquire any significant in-place leases or other intangible assets (e.g., management agreements, franchise agreements or trademarks) when hotels are acquired. The only intangible assets acquired through June 30, 2011 consisted of favorable tenant lease agreements and miscellaneous operating agreements, which are short-term in nature and at market rates. In conjunction with the acquisition of a hotel, the Company typically negotiates new franchise and management agreements with the selected brand and manager.

The Company’s investments in hotels are carried at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 15 years for land improvements, 40 years for buildings and improvements and three to five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Intangible assets arising from favorable or unfavorable leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the non-cancelable portion of the term of the agreement. Maintenance and repairs are expensed and major renewals or improvements are capitalized. Upon the sale or disposition of a fixed asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the related gain or loss is included in operations.

The Company considers each individual hotel to be an identifiable component of the business. In accordance with the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets guidance, the Company does not consider a hotel as “held for sale” until it is probable that the sale will be completed within one year and the other requisite criteria for such classification have been met. Once a hotel is designated as “held for sale” the operations for that hotel are included in discontinued operations. The Company does not depreciate hotel assets so long as they are classified as “held for sale.” Upon designation of a hotel as being “held for sale” and quarterly thereafter, the Company reviews the realizability of the carrying value, less cost to sell, in accordance with the guidance. Any such adjustment in the carrying value of a hotel classified as “held for sale” is reflected in discontinued operations. The Company includes in discontinued operations the operating results of those hotels that are classified as “held for sale.”

The Company assesses the carrying values of each hotel whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these hotels may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of the hotel is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the hotel to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows which take into account current market conditions and our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the hotel. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the hotel is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the hotel. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques; including internally developed discounted cash flow models, comparable market transactions and third party appraisals, where considered necessary.

The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with a market participant’s future expectations for the travel industry and economy in general and our strategic plans to manage the underlying hotels. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and our ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to a current impairment analysis could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of the hotels.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period excluding the weighted average number of unvested restricted shares (“participating securities” as defined in Note 11). The basic earning per share calculation includes the effect of such participating securities. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus other potentially dilutive securities such as stock grants or shares that would be issued in the event of conversion of operating partnership units. No adjustment is made for shares that are anti-dilutive during a period.

Share Based Compensation

From time to time, the Company may award non-vested shares under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), as compensation to officers, employees and non-employee trustees (see Note 10). The shares issued to officers and employees vest over a period of time as determined by the Board of Trustees at the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for non-vested shares on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures.

Acquisition of Hotel Properties

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Acquisition of Hotel Properties

Acquisition of Hotel Properties

3. Acquisition of Hotel Properties

The Company did not acquire any hotels during the three months ended June 30, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired the following hotels, which were funded by capital contributions:

Hotel	Location	Acquisition Date	Management Company	Rooms	Purchase Price			% Interest

Embassy Suites Columbus	Columbus, OH	January 11, 2011	Crescent Hotels and Resorts	221	$	9.5	million	100	%
Renaissance Pittsburgh Hotel	Pittsburgh, PA	January 12, 2011	Sage Hospitality	300	47.1		million	100	%
Courtyard Atlanta Buckhead	Atlanta, GA	January 18, 2011	Noble Management Group	181	27.0		million	100	%
Doubletree Hotel Columbia	Columbia, MD	January 18, 2011	Urgo Hotels	152	10.5		million	100	%
Denver Airport Marriott at Gateway Park	Denver, CO	January 18, 2011	Sage Hospitality	238	46.0		million	100	%
Crowne Plaza Hotel West Palm Beach	West Palm Beach, FL	January 18, 2011	Windsor Capital Group	219	16.0		million	100	%
Wyndham Raleigh Durham-Research Triangle Park	Durham, NC	January 24, 2011	Noble Management Group	175	7.0		million	100	%
Wyndham Pittsburgh	Pittsburgh, PA	January 24, 2011	Urgo Hotels	198	21.2		million	100	%
Hampton Inn Houston-Near the Galleria	Houston, TX	March 14, 2011	Interstate Management Company	176	20.3		million	100	%
				1,860	$	204.6	million

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired the following hotels, which were funded by capital contributions:

Hotel	Location	Acquisition Date	Management Company	Rooms	Purchase Price			% Interest
Embassy Suites Tampa	Tampa, FL	April 15, 2010	Hilton Hotels Corporation	360	$	76.9	million	100	%
Fairfield Inn and Suites Washington, DC	Washington, DC	June 1, 2010	Urgo Hotels	198	40.0		million	100	%
Embassy Suites Ft Myers/Estero	Ft Myers, FL	June 23, 2010	Hilton Hotels Corporation	150	13.2		million	100	%
				708	$	130.1	million

The allocation of purchase price for the hotel properties acquired was as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,
	2011		2010
Land and land improvements	$	29,131	$	21,199
Buildings and improvements	153,557		101,407
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	21,900		7,503
Total Purchase Price	$	204,588	$	130,109

There were no contingent consideration arrangements associated with these acquisitions nor was any goodwill recognized. See Note 16 for detail of non-cash prorations assumed at acquisition dates.

Total revenues and net income (loss) from the hotels acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, which are included in the accompanying unaudited combined consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are as follows (in thousands):

	2011 acquisitions
	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
Revenue	$	19,539	$	—	$	33,574		$	—
Net income (loss)	$	2,571	$	—	$	(65	)	$	—

	2010 acquisitions
	For the three months ended					For the six months ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
Revenue	$	8,105	$	4,136		$	16,029	$	4,136
Net income (loss)	$	353	$	(992	)	$	650	$	(992	)

The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information (in thousands) presents the results of operations as if the 2011 and 2010 acquisitions had taken place on the latter of January 1, 2010 or the opening date of the hotel. The Hilton New York / Fashion District did not open until April 2010. The Garden District Hotel acquired on October 26, 2010 has been closed since 2008 and accordingly has no operating history and is excluded from the condensed pro forma financial information. The condensed pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations of the Company would have been assuming the acquisitions had taken place on January 1, 2010, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods.

	For the three months ended						For the six months ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
Revenue	$	211,530		$	194,403		$	389,008		$	358,594
Net loss	$	(2,388	)	$	(678	)	$	(15,278	)	$	(20,639	)
Net loss per share attributable to common shareholders - basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)				$	(0.19	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic and diluted	88,767,570						81,228,975

- Definition

The entire disclosure for a business combination (or series of individually immaterial business combinations) completed during the period, including background, timing, and recognized assets and liabilities. The disclosure may include leverage buyout transactions (as applicable).

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
-Number 88-16
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141
-Paragraph 51, 52
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Appendix F
-Paragraph F4
-Subparagraph e

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 141R
-Paragraph 67-73
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911361&loc=d3e6927-128479

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1490-128463

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911361&loc=d3e7008-128479

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1500-128463

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4926-128472

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4922-128472

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911361&loc=d3e6996-128479

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 7
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1524-128463

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1392-128463

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6911361&loc=d3e7000-128479

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4845-128472

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6910749&loc=d3e4934-128472

Reference 17: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1497-128463

Reference 18: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1486-128463

Reference 19: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 805
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6972119&loc=d3e1383-128463

+ Details

Discontinued Operations

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

4. Discontinued Operations

On November 16, 2009, RLJ Development, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell six hotels. The assets were reclassified as held for sale and the operating results for the hotels were reclassified to discontinued operations. On April 23, 2010, RLJ Development completed the sale of the six hotels for a total sale price of $73.5 million. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $23.7 million.

On April 23, 2010, the Company defeased five individual mortgages associated with the aforementioned six hotels sold on April 23, 2010 by replacing the original collateral with government securities. These loans carried an outstanding balance of $34.0 million at April 23, 2010. On April 28, 2010, the Company fully repaid the remaining outstanding $8.5 million mortgage loan associated with the six hotels sold on April 23, 2010, including a mortgage prepayment penalty totaling $0.2 million.

Operating results of discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

	For the three months ended June 30,			For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2010
Net revenues	$	1,335		$	6,774
Operating expenses	1,011			4,776
Operating income	324			1,998
Interest expense	(2,341		)	(3,210		)
Net income from discontinued operations, before gain on sale	(2,017		)	(1,212		)
Gain on sale of properties	23,715			23,715
Net income from discontinued operations	$	21,698		$	22,503

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the facts and circumstances leading to the completed or expected disposal, manner and timing of disposal, the gain (loss) recognized in the income statement and the income statement caption that includes that gain (loss), amounts of revenues and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations, the segment in which the disposal group was reported, and the classification (whether sold or classified as held for sale) and carrying value of the assets and liabilities comprising the disposal group. Includes all disposal groups, including those classified as components of the entity (discontinued operations).

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 144
-Paragraph 43-48
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 360
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6391110&loc=d3e2941-110230

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1361-107760

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1510-107760

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e1020-107759

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e1012-107759

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6892542&loc=d3e957-107759

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1474-107760

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 360
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6390789&loc=d3e2443-110228

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6360339&loc=d3e1436-107760

+ Details

Investment in Hotel Properties

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in Hotel Properties

5. Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in hotel properties as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Land and land improvements	$	517,162		$	488,031
Buildings and improvements	2,344,752			2,188,153
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	355,347			310,266
Intangibles	1,298			1,298
	3,218,559			2,987,748
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(424,927		)	(361,058		)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	2,793,632		$	2,626,690

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, depreciation and amortization expense related to investment in hotel properties was approximately $31.4 million and $63.8 million (excluding discontinued operations), respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense related to investment in hotel properties was approximately $24.0 million and $47.4 million (excluding discontinued operations), respectively.

Impairment

During each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company determined there was no impairment on its investment in hotels.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for long-lived, physical assets that are used in the normal conduct of business to produce goods and services and not intended for resale. Examples include land, buildings, machinery and equipment, and other types of furniture and equipment including, but not limited to, office equipment, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment and software. This disclosure may include property plant and equipment accounting policies and methodology, a schedule of property, plant and equipment gross, additions, deletions, transfers and other changes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, net, accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and useful lives, income statement disclosures, assets held for sale and public utility disclosures.

+ References + Details

Debt

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Debt

Debt

6. Debt

Credit Facility

On June 20, 2011, the Company, through the Operating Partnership, entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility that provides for maximum borrowings of up to $300.0 million. The credit facility requires that a group of no less than fifteen of the Company’s hotel properties remain unencumbered by outstanding indebtedness. The credit facility contains certain financial covenants relating to maximum leverage ratio, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum tangible net worth and maximum secured indebtedness. If an event of default exists, under the terms of the credit facility, the Company is not permitted to make distributions to shareholders, other than those required to qualify for and maintain REIT status. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.

The credit facility matures on June 20, 2014 and may be extended for an additional year, at the Company’s option. In addition, the Company has the option to increase the revolving loan commitment to $450.0 million, subject to certain conditions. The Company incurred $3.0 million in deferred financing fees related to the credit facility.

Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at variable rates equal to the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin. The margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.25%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, as calculated under the terms of the credit facility. The Company incurs an unused facility fee of between 0.30% and 0.40%, based on the amount by which the maximum borrowing amount exceeds the total principal balance of outstanding borrowings.

Under the terms of the credit facility, one or more standby letters of credit, up to a maximum aggregate outstanding balance of $30.0 million, may be issued on behalf of the Company by the lenders holding the credit facility. The Company will incur a fee of 0.125% of the value of each standby letter of credit that is issued on its behalf. Any outstanding standby letters of credit would reduce the available borrowings on the credit facility by a corresponding amount. No standby letters of credit were outstanding at June 30, 2011. The Company also may borrow up to a maximum aggregate outstanding balance of $40.0 million of swingline loans. Any outstanding swingline loans would reduce the available borrowings on the credit facility by a corresponding amount. No swingline loans were outstanding at June 30, 2011.

The Company did not incur any interest expense on the credit facility for the three or six months ended June 30, 2011. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred an unused commitment fee of approximately $37,000. There were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2011.

Predecessor Credit Facility

RLJ Fund III, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, maintained a credit facility that provided for maximum borrowings of up to $200.0 million. The credit facility was collateralized by RLJ Fund III’s partners’ committed and uncalled capital and was guaranteed by RLJ Fund III. Borrowings under the credit facility bore interest at variable rates equal to the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin of 0.75%. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the credit facility was approximately 1.00%. There were no borrowings at June 30, 2011 since the credit facility matured on January 31, 2011.

RLJ Fund III incurred interest expense related to the credit facility of approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. No interest expense related to the credit facility was incurred for either the three or six months ended June 30, 2011. Additionally, there was an unused commitment fee of 0.15% of the unused portion of the credit facility. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, RLJ Fund III incurred an unused commitment fee of approximately $12,000. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, RLJ Fund III incurred an unused commitment fee of approximately $34,000 and $68,000, respectively.

RLJ Fund III was subject to a letter of credit (now held by the Company) with a value of approximately $1.9 million related to securing a swap agreement on certain variable rate mortgages. No balances were drawn on this letter of credit as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

At December 31, 2010, RLJ Fund III had approximately $198.1 million available for borrowing.

Mortgage Loans

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company was subject to the following mortgage loans (in thousands):

	Number	Interest rate at
	of Assets	June 30,		Maturity		Principal balance at,
Lender	Encumbered	2011 (1)		Date		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Capmark Financial Group	1	1.36	%(3)	July 2010		$	58,000		$	58,000
Keybank (2)	6	4.57	%(3)	April 2012		48,000			48,000
State Street Bank (2)		6.08	%(3)	April 2012		37,000			37,000
Wells Fargo	1	4.26	%(4)	June 2013	(5)	60,000			60,000
Wells Fargo	1	5.50	%(4)	Oct 2013	(5)	40,000			40,000
Wells Fargo	1	5.50	%(4)	Oct 2013	(5)	31,000			31,000
Wells Fargo	1	4.90	%(6)	Dec 2013	(5)	150,000			150,000
Blackstone		10.75	%(6)	Dec 2013	(5)	50,000			50,000
Capmark Financial Group	1	6.12	%	April 2015		4,386			4,446
Capmark Financial Group	1	5.50	%	May 2015		5,050			5,123
Capmark Financial Group	1	5.55	%	May 2015		11,826			11,997
Capmark Financial Group	1	5.55	%	June 2015		5,130			5,205
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		2,680			2,718
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		4,399			4,462
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		10,253			10,400
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		9,151			9,282
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		8,200			8,317
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.60	%	June 2015		5,671			5,751
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.60	%	June 2015		8,833			8,956
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		5,373			5,450
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		35,624			36,135
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.60	%	June 2015		6,765			6,861
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		6,029			6,116
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		6,929			7,028
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.60	%	June 2015		8,826			8,952
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		6,919			7,018
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		7,616			7,724
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		6,929			7,028
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		7,909			8,023
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.55	%	June 2015		9,925			10,068
Capmark Financial Group	1	5.50	%	July 2015		6,983			7,083
Barclay’s Bank	1	5.44	%	Sept 2015		11,385			11,547
Merrill Lynch	1	6.29	%	July 2016		9,347			9,403
Merrill Lynch	1	6.29	%	July 2016		5,573			5,605
Merrill Lynch	1	6.29	%	July 2016		7,824			7,871
Merrill Lynch	1	6.29	%	July 2016		9,362			9,416
Wachovia Securities	43	6.29	%	July 2016		496,159			499,132
Wachovia Securities	1	6.29	%	July 2016		6,702			6,742
Wells Fargo / Morgan Stanley	2	6.29	%	July 2016		35,456			35,669
Wells Fargo / Morgan Stanley	1	6.29	%	July 2016		6,876			6,916
Wells Fargo / Morgan Stanley	1	6.29	%	July 2016		9,790			9,845
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	72,246
Merrill Lynch	10	—		—		—		(7)	92,000
Wells Fargo	1	—		—		—		(7)	23,967
Wells Fargo / GE	13	—		—		—		(7)	186,392
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	10,818
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	9,975
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	12,350
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	10,334
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	22,934
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	11,078
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	11,355
Capmark Financial Group	1	—		—		—		(7)	13,339
	120					$	1,263,880		$	1,747,077

(1) Interest rate at June 30, 2011 gives effect to interest rate swaps and LIBOR floors, where applicable.

(2) The Keybank/State Street Bank loans are a senior and a mezzanine loan, which, as of June 30, 2011 had outstanding balances of $48 million and $37 million, respectively.

(3) Requires payments of interest only.

(4) Requires payments of interest only until the commencement of the extension periods.

(5) Maturity date may be extended for up to two additional one-year terms at the Company’s option (subject to the Company’s prior satisfaction of certain conditions and advance notice of the exercise of the Company’s option).

(6) Requires payments of interest only until the commencement of the second extension period.

(7) Loan(s) was/(were) paid off in conjunction with the IPO on May 16, 2011.

Some mortgage agreements are subject to customary financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

In February 2010, RLJ Fund II received a notice of event of default for failure to make the required monthly payment on its mortgage loan secured by the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott located in New York, NY. The mortgage loan matured in July 2010. In April 2011, RLJ Fund II escrowed an executed deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement for the benefit of the lenders. On August 5, 2011, the Company transferred title to the hotel to the lenders pursuant to the deed in lieu of foreclosure arrangement. At June 30, 2011 the book value of the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott equals the fair market value, which is less than the mortgage loan balance.

Term Loan

On January 14, 2011, RLJ Fund III entered into a $140.0 million unsecured term loan. RLJ Fund III agreed to maintain an unencumbered asset pool of ten hotel properties during the term of the term loan. The term loan contains certain financial covenants related to maximum leverage ratio, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum net worth. As of June 30, 2011, the Company is in compliance with all financial covenants.

The term loan has an original maturity date of September 30, 2011, with two six month extension options, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.25%, with a LIBOR floor of 1.00% (5.25% and zero at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $1.7 million and $3.2 million of interest expense, respectively, related to the term loan.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for information about short-term and long-term debt arrangements, which includes amounts of borrowings under each line of credit, note payable, commercial paper issue, bonds indenture, debenture issue, own-share lending arrangements and any other contractual agreement to repay funds, and about the underlying arrangements, rationale for a classification as long-term, including repayment terms, interest rates, collateral provided, restrictions on use of assets and activities, whether or not in compliance with debt covenants, and other matters important to users of the financial statements, such as the effects of refinancing and noncompliance with debt covenants.

+ References + Details

Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

7. Income Taxes

The Company intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Section 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its owners. The Company’s current intention is to adhere to these requirements and maintain the qualification for taxation as a REIT. As a REIT, the Company is not subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of net income that is currently distributed to its owners. However, the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) will generally be subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted.

The Company had no accruals for tax uncertainties as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for income taxes. Disclosures may include net deferred tax liability or asset recognized in an enterprise's statement of financial position, net change during the year in the total valuation allowance, approximate tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carryforward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, utilization of a tax carryback, and tax uncertainties information.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Section 08
-Paragraph h
-Article 4

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 136, 172
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 109
-Paragraph 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 15
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32718-109319

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 9
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32639-109319

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(h))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32537-109319

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 740
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6907707&loc=d3e32559-109319

+ Details

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is obligated to maintain reserve funds for capital expenditures at the hotels (including the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment) as determined pursuant to the management agreements, franchise agreements and/or mortgage loan documents. The management agreements, franchise agreements and/or mortgage loan documents require the Company to reserve restricted cash ranging from 1.0% to 5.0% of the individual hotel’s revenues and maintain the reserves in restricted cash reserve escrows. Amounts will be capitalized as incurred. Any unexpended amounts will remain the property of the Company upon termination of the management agreements, franchise agreements or mortgage loan documents. Additionally, some mortgage agreements require the Company to reserve restricted cash for the periodic payment of real estate taxes and insurance. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately $93.5 million and $65.9 million, respectively, was available in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures, real estate taxes and insurance.

As of June 30, 2011, the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott was in default on it is mortgage loan. Under the terms of the mortgage loan, the lender receives the monthly net cash from operations from the hotel. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately $1.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively, of cash was held by the lender.

Litigation

Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are currently involved in any regulatory or legal proceedings that management believes will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, operations or liquidity of the Company.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Interpretation (FIN)
-Number 14
-Paragraph 3
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 5
-Paragraph 9, 10, 11, 12
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 210
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 450
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952336&loc=d3e14435-108349

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 460
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 440
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621

+ Details

Equity

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Equity

Equity

9. Equity

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

Under the declaration of trust of the Company, the total number of shares initially authorized for issuance was 100,000 common shares. At formation, the Company issued each of its two shareholders 500 common shares at $1 per share. On May 5, 2011, the Board of Trustees amended and restated the declaration of trust to authorize the issuance of up to 450,000,000 common shares.

On May 16, 2011, RLJ Lodging Trust completed its IPO and formation transactions. The IPO resulted in the sale of 27,500,000 common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share, at $18.00 per share, for total gross proceeds of $495.0 million. The aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discounts, were approximately $464.1 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the IPO and cash on hand to repay approximately $472.6 million of secured indebtedness. The Company recorded costs incurred in connection with the IPO as a reduction of additional paid-in capital in shareholders’ equity. Costs incurred in connection with the formation transactions for the transfer and assumption of indebtedness and other contractual obligations of the RLJ Predecessor were expensed as incurred and are included in IPO costs. In connection with the formation transactions, the Company issued 73,605,951 common shares of beneficial interest as consideration to certain entities for their interest in certain entities that merged with and into the Company or the Company’s subsidiaries in the formation transactions.

On May 16, 2011, the Company granted 1,075,000 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to certain executives and employees. The shares vest ratably over 16 quarters. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 2011 Plan.

On May 16, 2011, the Company granted 20,830 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to certain members of the Board of Trustees. The shares vest ratably over 4 quarters. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 2011 Plan.

On June 3, 2011, the Company issued and sold an additional 4,095,000 common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share, at a price per share of $18.00 upon exercise of the Overallotment, for total gross proceeds of $73.7 million. The Company received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $69.1 million in connection with the Overallotment. The Company holds the net proceeds from the Overallotment as cash to be used for working capital purposes or to invest in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities, and money market accounts that are consistent with its intention to qualify as a REIT.

On June 17, 2011, the Company granted 25,000 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to certain executives and employees. The shares vest ratably over 16 quarters. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 2011 Plan.

On June 17, 2011, the Company’s Board of Trustees declared a prorated cash dividend of $0.08 per common share of beneficial interest, payable on July 15, 2011 to shareholders of record as of June 30, 2011. The $0.08 dividend was prorated from May 16, 2011, the closing date of the IPO, through June 30, 2011.

On June 30, 2011, the Company granted an aggregate of 2,302 fully vested common shares of beneficial interest to certain members of the Board of Trustees as part of their 2011 compensation.

Noncontrolling Interest in Joint Venture

As of June 30, 2011, the Company consolidates DBT Met Hotel Venture, LP, a majority-owned partnership that has a third-party, noncontrolling 5.0% ownership interest. The third-party partnership interest is included in noncontrolling interest in joint venture on the balance sheet.

Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership

The Company consolidates its Operating Partnership, a majority owned partnership that has a noncontrolling ownership interest and is included in noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership on the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership had 107,218,083 OP units outstanding, of which 99.2% were owned by the Company and its subsidiaries and 0.8% were owned by other limited partners.

The outstanding OP units held by limited partners are redeemable for cash, or at the option of the Company, for a like number of common shares of beneficial interest of the Company.

Partners’ Capital

As of May 16, 2011, the RLJ Fund II partners had made aggregate capital contributions of approximately $726.2 million. In addition, $16.9 million of advisory fees, which reduce limited partner capital commitments, had been paid by the limited partners to the Fund II General Partner. Accordingly, 100.0% of total capital commitments had been committed as of May 16, 2011. As of May 16, 2011, RLJ Fund II had made distributions of approximately $162.0 million, in aggregate, including approximately $26.5 million of advisory fees distributed to the Fund II General Partner on behalf of the limited partners. On May 16, 2011, RLJ Fund II was merged into the Company.

As of May 16, 2011, the RLJ Fund III partners had made aggregate capital contributions of approximately $917.3 million. In addition, $50.1 million of advisory fees, which reduce limited partner capital commitments, had been paid by the limited partners to the Fund III General Partner. Accordingly, 81.2% of total capital commitments had been deployed as of May 16, 2011. As of May 16, 2011, RLJ Fund III had made no distributions, except for advisory fees (see Note 14). On May 16, 2011, RLJ Fund III was merged into the Company.

On May 16, 2011, in conjunction with the IPO, the partners of RLJ Fund II and RLJ Fund III received 73,605,951 common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share, at $18.00 per share, for a total gross amount of $1,324.9 million, in exchange for their partnership interests in RLJ Fund II and RLJ Fund III.

Members’ Capital

The rights and obligations of the equity holders of RLJ Development (the “Members”) are governed by the limited liability company agreement of RLJ Development, dated December 19, 2000 and amended January 1, 2002 (the “Operating Agreement”). Each member’s interest in the Company is equal to the percentage of capital initially contributed by that Member. The Class A Member holds a 75% ownership interest and the two Class B members hold a total interest of 25%. The Class A Member has made capital contributions totaling $115.3 million, none of which were contributed during the period from January 1, 2011 through May 16, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010. The Class B Members were not required to make, nor have they made any, capital contributions during the period from January 1, 2011 through May 16, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010.

On May 16, 2011, in conjunction with the IPO, the members of RLJ Development received 894,000 OP Units, at $18.00 per unit, for a total gross amount of $16.1 million, in exchange for their contribution to the Operating Partnership of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of RLJ Development.

Preferred Distributions

RLJ Fund II, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, made distributions to preferred unitholders semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 each year. As of May 16, 2011, an aggregate of approximately $0.1 million had been distributed or was payable to preferred unitholders. On May 16, 2011, in conjunction with the IPO, the RLJ Fund II unitholders interests in RLJ Fund II were redeemed. The Company paid the unitholders the liquidation value of $250,000 plus accumulated and unpaid dividends of approximately $12,000 and a redemption premium of approximately $12,000.

RLJ Fund III, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, made distributions to preferred unitholders semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 each year. As of May 16, 2011, an aggregate of approximately $0.1 million had been distributed or was payable to preferred unitholders. On May 16, 2011, in conjunction with the IPO, the RLJ Fund III unitholders interests in RLJ Fund III were redeemed. The Company paid the unitholders the liquidation value of $250,000 plus accumulated and unpaid dividends of approximately $12,000 and a redemption premium of approximately $24,000.

Equity Incentive Plan

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Equity Incentive Plan

Equity Incentive Plan

10. Equity Incentive Plan

The Company may issue equity-based awards to officers, employees, non-employee trustees and other eligible persons under the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan provides for a maximum of 5,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest to be issued in the form of share options, share appreciation rights, restricted share awards, unrestricted share awards, share units, dividend equivalent rights, long-term incentive units, other equity-based awards and cash bonus awards. In addition, the maximum number of common shares subject to awards of any combination that may be granted under the 2011 Plan during any calendar year to any one individual is limited to 1,000,000 shares. The exercise price of share options is determined by the Board of Trustees, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. For grantees that own greater than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding voting securities of the Company, the exercise price of share options may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. The fair market value for all other types of share awards is determined by the closing price on the date of grant. As of June 30, 2011, there were 3,876,868 of shares available for future grant under the 2011 Plan.

Non-vested Restricted Share Awards

From time to time, the Company may award non-vested shares under the 2011 Plan, as compensation to officers, employees and non-employee trustees. The shares issued to officers and employees vest over a period of time as determined by the Board of Trustees at the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for non-vested shares on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, adjusted for forfeitures.

A summary of the non-vested shares as of June 30, 2011 is as follows:

	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2011	—	$	—
Granted	1,120,830	17.93
Vested	—	—
Forfeited	—	—
Unvested at June 30, 2011	1,120,830	$	17.93

For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $0.6 million of share-based compensation expense related to these restricted share awards. As of June 30, 2011, there was $19.5 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share awards. As of June 30, 2011, these costs were expected to be primarily recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years. The total fair value of shares vested (calculated as number of shares multiplied by vesting date share price) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was zero. There were no forfeitures for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for compensation-related costs for equity-based compensation, which may include disclosure of policies, compensation plan details, allocation of equity compensation, incentive distributions, equity-based arrangements to obtain goods and services, deferred compensation arrangements, employee stock ownership plan details and employee stock purchase plan details.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 123R
-Paragraph 64, 65, A240
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Statement of Position (SOP)
-Number 93-6
-Paragraph 53
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
-Number Topic 14

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 505
-SubTopic 50
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6406099&loc=d3e25284-112666

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5047-113901

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5070-113901

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6415400&loc=d3e5444-113901

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 718
-SubTopic 40
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6418621&loc=d3e17540-113929

+ Details

Earnings per Common Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Earnings per Common Share

Earnings per Common Share

11. Earnings per Common Share

The limited partners’ outstanding limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership (which may be converted to common shares of beneficial interest) have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as there would be no effect on the amounts since the limited partners’ share of income would also be added back to net income. Any anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Accordingly, distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares (participating securities) have been excluded, as applicable, from net income or loss attributable to common shareholders utilized in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. Net income or loss figures are presented net of noncontrolling interests in the earnings per share calculations. The weighted average number of OP units held by the noncontrolling interest was 894,000 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, diluted weighted average common shares do not include the impact of unvested compensation-related shares because the effect of these items on diluted earnings per share would be anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, there were 1,120,830 anti-dilutive compensation-related shares outstanding.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	For the three months ended,			For the six months ended,
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2011

Numerator:
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(2,568	)	$	(18,700	)
Less: Dividends paid on unvested restricted shares	(90		)	(90		)
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares	—			—

Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(2,658	)	$	(18,790	)

Denominator:
Weighted-average number of common shares - basic	88,767,570			81,228,975
Unvested restricted shares (1)	—			—
Weighted-average number of common shares - diluted	88,767,570			81,228,975

Loss per share attributable to common shareholders - basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.23	)

(1) Anti-dilutive for all periods presented.

Unvested restricted shares are considered participating securities which require the use of the two-class method for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, no earnings representing nonforfeitable dividends were allocated to the unvested restricted shares issued, because the Company had a net loss for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011.

Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

12. Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

The Company employs interest rate swaps and caps to hedge against interest rate fluctuations. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in other comprehensive loss with no effect recognized in earnings as long as the characteristics of the swap and the hedged item are closely matched. The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in earnings in the current period. As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 21.9% of the Company’s borrowings were subject to variable rates, after taking into consideration the effect of interest rate swaps and caps.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has entered into the following interest rate swaps and caps (in thousands):

	Notional value at					Hedge			Fair value at
Hedge type	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010		interest rate		Maturity	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Swap-cash flow	$	—		$	28,269	3.09	%	1/22/2011	$	—		$	(120	)
Swap-cash flow	—			8,732		3.45	%	4/30/2011	—			(114		)
Interest rate cap	—			73,168		5.00	%	6/9/2011	—			—
Interest rate cap	—		(1)	60,000		5.00	%	7/15/2011	—			—
Interest rate cap	16,000			16,000		5.00	%	7/15/2011	—			—
Interest rate cap	16,000			16,000		5.00	%	7/15/2011	—			—
Swap-cash flow	—		(1)	11,418		3.33	%	9/22/2011	—			(266		)
Swap-cash flow	85,000			85,000		3.33	%	9/22/2011	(835		)	(2,095		)
Interest rate cap	48,000			48,000		6.00	%	4/9/2012	—			—
Interest rate cap	37,000			37,000		6.00	%	4/9/2012	—			—
Interest rate cap	60,000			60,000		5.00	%	6/29/2012	2			18
Interest rate cap	50,000			50,000		3.50	%	12/23/2012	10			71
Swap-cash flow	150,000			150,000		1.15	%	12/23/2012	(1,701		)	(1,384		)
Swap-cash flow	40,000			40,000		1.00	%	10/6/2013	(273		)	39
Swap-cash flow	31,000			31,000		1.00	%	10/6/2013	(211		)	31
	$	533,000		$	714,587				$	(3,008	)	$	(3,820	)

(1) Interest rate swap was terminated in conjunction with the IPO on May 16, 2011.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was approximately $3.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively, in unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholders’ equity, related to interest rate hedges that are effective in offsetting the variable cash flows. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 approximately $20,000 and $42,000, respectively, in unrealized gains were recognized in earnings related to hedges that were ineffective in offsetting variable cash flows. There were no ineffective hedges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the entity's entire derivative instruments and hedging activities. Describes an entity's risk management strategies, derivatives in hedging activities and non-hedging derivative instruments, the assets, obligations, liabilities, revenues and expenses arising therefrom, and the amounts of and methodologies and assumptions used in determining the amounts of such items.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 133
-Paragraph 45
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 133
-Paragraph 44
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6887037&loc=d3e80784-113994

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5579245-113959

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4B
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5624163-113959

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4C
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5624171-113959

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=d3e41638-113959

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1B
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5580258-113959

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5579240-113959

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=d3e41641-113959

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=d3e41620-113959

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 25
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6886632&loc=d3e76258-113986

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4E
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5624181-113959

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4A
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5618551-113959

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4D
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5624177-113959

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 30
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6887037&loc=d3e80748-113994

Reference 17: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4H
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5624258-113959

Reference 18: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4K
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5708775-113959

Reference 19: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=d3e41635-113959

Reference 20: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(n))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 21: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4J
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6935481&loc=SL5708773-113959

Reference 22: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 815
-SubTopic 30
-Section 45
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6441202&loc=d3e80720-113993

+ Details

Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Fair Value

Fair Value

13. Fair Value

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methods. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The Company used the following market assumptions and/or estimation methods:

· Cash and cash equivalents, hotel receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses - The carrying amounts reported in the combined consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate fair value because of their short maturities.

· Investment in collateralized loans - Fair value is determined by discounting the future contractual cash flows to the present value using a current market interest rate. The fair value estimated at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $22.1 million.

· Interest rate swaps and caps - The fair value of interest rate swaps and caps is determined as discussed in Note 12 to these financial statements.

· Variable rate mortgage notes payable and borrowings under the credit facility - The carrying amounts reported in the combined consolidated balance sheets for these financial instruments approximate fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of its variable rate debt by using quoted market rates for similar loans with similar terms.

· Fixed rate mortgage notes payable - The fair value estimated at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 of $785.8 million and $796.5 million, respectively, is calculated based on the net present value of payments over the term of the loans using estimated market rates for similar mortgage loans with similar terms.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market. The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable:

· Level 1— Inputs include quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.

· Level 2 — Inputs are market data, other than Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data.

· Level 3 — Inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or no market data.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements: The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for those financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands).

	Fair Value at June 30, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Interest rate swap and cap liability	$	—	$	(3,008	)	$	—	$	(3,008	)
Total	$	—	$	(3,008	)	$	—	$	(3,008	)

The fair values of the derivative financial instruments are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The Company determined that the significant inputs, such as interest yield curves and discount rates, used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and that the credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company’s counterparties and its own credit risk utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. As of June 30, 2011, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 133
-Paragraph 44A, 44B
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 107
-Paragraph 15C, 15D
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 107
-Paragraph 15A
-Subparagraph a-d
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 107
-Paragraph 15B
-Subparagraph a, b
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 107
-Paragraph 3, 10, 14, 15
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 157
-Paragraph 32, 33, 34
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 159
-Paragraph 17-22, 27, 28
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6925170&loc=d3e19207-110258

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 21
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13537-108611

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 28
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13433-108611

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 30
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 16
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13504-108611

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6925170&loc=d3e19296-110258

+ Details

Advisory Fees

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Advisory Fees

Advisory Fees

14. Advisory Fees

Pursuant to the terms of the RLJ Fund II LP Agreements, the Fund II General Partner was entitled to receive annual advisory fees directly from the limited partners in consideration for the Fund II General Partner providing and managing the day-to-day operations and expenditures of RLJ Fund II. Total advisory fees due to the Fund II General Partner from limited partners, including advisory fees due from the limited partners admitted during subsequent closes, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, were approximately $1.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, were approximately $2.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all advisory fees due had been paid by the limited partners.

Pursuant to the terms of the RLJ Fund III LP Agreements, the Fund III General Partner was entitled to receive annual advisory fees directly from the limited partners in consideration for the Fund III General Partner providing and managing the day-to-day operations and expenditures of RLJ Fund III. Total advisory fees due to the Fund III General Partner from limited partners, including advisory fees due from the limited partners admitted during subsequent closes, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, were approximately $1.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, were approximately $3.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all advisory fees due had been paid by the limited partners.

The combined consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect these advisory fees as contributions and distributions within the respective partner accounts. As a result of the combination of RLJ Development with RLJ Fund II and RLJ Fund III and after elimination entries, the actual expenses associated with operating RLJ Fund II and RLJ Fund III have been reflected in these financial statements. Upon completion of the IPO and related formation transactions, the advisory fee obligations of the limited partners ceased to exist.

Related Party Transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions

15. Related Party Transactions

The RLJ Predecessor paid monthly fees for management advisory services to the managing member of RLJ Development, which are included in general and administrative expense. Such fees amounted to $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively and $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Upon completion of the IPO and related formation transactions, the management fee obligation of the RLJ Predecessor ceased to exist.

RLJ Companies LLC, a related party, periodically pays certain amounts on the Company’s behalf. As of June 30, 2011 there was approximately $8,000 due to RLJ Companies, LLC, which was included in accounts payable and other expenses. At December 31, 2010, there was $0.1 million due to RLJ Companies, LLC, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

The RLJ Predecessor paid certain costs on the behalf of RLJ Development (Mexico), LLC, a related party through common-ownership, and RLJ Development (Mexico), LLC paid for certain amounts on the RLJ Predecessor’s behalf. At December 31, 2010, the amounts due from RLJ Development (Mexico), LLC were $0.7 million which were included in prepaid and other assets. The Company did not have any amount due from or payable to RLJ Development (Mexico), LLC at June 30, 2011.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company made charitable contributions totaling $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expense. These charitable contributions were paid to various foundations and charitable organizations, of which $25,000 and $25,000 respectively, were directed by related parties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company made charitable contributions totaling $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expense. These charitable contributions were paid to various foundations and charitable organizations, of which $25,000 and $50,000 respectively, were directed by related parties.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for related party transactions, including the nature of the relationship(s), a description of the transactions, the amount of the transactions, the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms of the transaction from the previous period, stated interest rate, expiration date, terms and manner of settlement per the agreement with the related party, and amounts due to or from related parties. If the entity and one or more other entities are under common ownership or management control and this control affects the operating results or financial position, disclosure includes the nature of the control relationship even if there are no transactions between the entities. Disclosure may also include the aggregate amount of current and deferred tax expense for each statement of earnings presented where the entity is a member of a group that files a consolidated tax return, the amount of any tax related balances due to or from affiliates as of the date of each statement of financial position presented, the principal provisions of the method by which the consolidated amount of current and deferred tax expense is allocated to the members of the group and the nature and effect of any changes in that method. Examples of related party transactions include transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners; and (d) affiliates.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Article 4
-Section 08
-Paragraph k

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Regulation S-X (SX)
-Number 210
-Article 3A
-Section 04
-Paragraph b

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)
-Number 57
-Paragraph 1-4
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39622-107864

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39549-107864

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39603-107864

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(k))
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6881521&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39691-107864

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 850
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 5
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6457730&loc=d3e39678-107864

+ Details

Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

16. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010

Interest paid	$	50,908		$	43,531

Income taxes paid	$	1,010		$	844

Supplemental non-cash transactions:
In conjunction with the hotel acquisitions, the Company assumed the following assets and liabilities:
Purchase of real estate	$	204,588		$	130,109
Accounts receivable	457			118
Other assets	862			598
Advance deposits	(368		)	(161		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(2,209		)	(660		)
Application of purchase deposit	(8,500		)	—
Acquisition of hotel properties	$	194,830		$	130,004
In conjunction with the hotel disposals, the Company disposed of the following assets and liabilities:
Sale of real estate	$	—		$	49,451
Gain on sale of property		—			23,715
Disposition of hotel properties	$	—		$	73,166
Change in fair market value of interest rate swaps	$	812		$	8,217
Distributions payable	$	8,577		$	—
Preferred distributions payable	$	47		$	—

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

17. Subsequent Events

On July 15, 2011, the Company paid a dividend of $0.08 per common share of beneficial interest to shareholders of record at June 30, 2011.

On August 5, 2011, the Company transferred title to the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott to the lenders pursuant to a deed in lieu of foreclosure arrangement (see Note 6). As a result, the Company expects to record a third quarter gain on the forgiveness of indebtedness of approximately $23.0 million.

Document and Entity Information - shares	6 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information - shares	Jun. 30, 2011	Aug. 12, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	RLJ Lodging Trust
Entity Central Index Key	0001511337
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	No
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		106,324,083
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

Label	Element	Value
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	us-gaap_StockholdersEquityIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterest	$ (3,806,000)

- Definition

Total of Stockholders' Equity (deficit) items, net of receivables from officers, directors, owners, and affiliates of the entity including portions attributable to both the parent and noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interest), if any. The entity including portions attributable to the parent and noncontrolling interests is sometimes referred to as the economic entity. This excludes temporary equity and is sometimes called permanent equity.

+ References + Details